Epstein survivor accuses Palace of cover-up
Epstein survivor accuses Palace of cover-up
Natasha LeakeSun, May 31, 2026 at 10:16 AM UTC
0
Jess Michaels has said the Palace’s failure to act on incriminating evidence has wider moral consequences for survivors
A survivor of Jeffrey Epstein has accused Buckingham Palace of covering up the actions of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.
Jess Michaels, who was sexually assaulted by Epstein in 1991 when she was 22 years old, claimed the institution had failed to act on evidence that he had leaked confidential government information.
Speaking to The Telegraph, she accused the Palace of “protecting” Mr Mountbatten-Windsor after it had received emails six years ago showing that he had shared sensitive government information with a business contact while he was a trade envoy.
“Six years ago, the Palace knew Andrew wasn’t just a problem, he could face a criminal investigation. And they sat on it,” Ms Michaels said in a statement to The Telegraph.
Ms Michaels, who was a professional dancer in New York City when Epstein assaulted her, added that the failure to act had wider moral consequences for survivors and others connected to the case.
“Protecting him meant doubting her. Virginia Roberts Giuffre was telling the truth, and she didn’t live to see them admit it. That breaks my heart and it should break everyone’s,” she added.
“This is what institutions do. They protect powerful men and leave the people they harmed to carry it.”
Max Mumby/Indigo
Ms Michaels said that she was glad the UK was investigating Mr Mountbatten-Windsor, describing it as “the very least they could do”.
“I’m glad the UK is finally investigating,” she told The Telegraph. “A little late, but it’s the very least they could do. Meanwhile our own government named us as victims, shields the men who harmed us and still treats us like the problem.”
Mr Mountbatten-Windsor’s association with Jeffrey Epstein has been the subject of sustained public and legal scrutiny for several years.
Virginia Roberts Giuffre, one of Epstein’s most prominent accusers, claimed she had been trafficked to Mr Mountbatten-Windsor when she was 17 years old.
Advertisement
In February, on his 66th birthday, Mr Mountbatten-Windsor was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office over allegations that he had passed sensitive government information to Epstein while working as a trade envoy.
Paperwork released as part of the Epstein files appears to show Mr Mountbatten-Windsor forwarding official reports in November 2010 relating to trips to Hong Kong, Singapore, Vietnam and China.
He denies all wrongdoing.
Court-related documents indicate that Buckingham Palace was provided with large volumes of correspondence in 2020 that raised questions about Mr Mountbatten-Windsor’s conduct in public office.
According to the documents, the Lord Chamberlain, the Palace’s most senior official, received a tranche of around 30,000 emails, including some relating to Mr Mountbatten-Windsor.
The former prince is understood to have forwarded correspondence to Jonathan Rowland, a close friend and the former chief executive of Banque Havilland, during his time as a trade envoy between 2001 and 2011.
The emergence of these claims has increased scrutiny of the Palace, how much was known about Mr Mountbatten-Windsor at the time, and what action, if any, was taken over his actions.
Palace ‘has to be reviewed’
On Saturday, Rachel Maskell, the Labour MP for York Central, called for a public inquiry, saying that “the system built around the royal household has to be reviewed” during an appearance on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
“The web grows ever darker and that is why we have got to address the issue of unaccountable power and also the abuse of power in high office,” she said.
She added that she wanted a joint committee of members from the House of Commons and House of Lords to be established to scrutinise the royal household.
When asked by the BBC about the emails, Buckingham Palace said: “Since there is an ongoing police inquiry concerning Mr Mountbatten-Windsor, it is not possible to provide any comment on these matters.”
Buckingham Palace declined to comment when contacted by The Telegraph.
Source: “AOL Entertainment”
